On the other hand, most shoppers know that some advertisements they read and see all around them are persuasive and created to spark emotion which will drive them to buy an item they do not even need. This is aspect of Dinyar Godrej view, which is that advertising is worse for society than it is good for society. He supports his side by explaining the media business and the corporate giants who control every second of airplay and the idea that advertising which is displayed by the corporate giants are not to inform society but to persuade them to think a certain way and do a certain thing, buy their products. He also makes the point that advertising companies portraying a "lifestyle that is beyond reach of all but the wealthy."
After reading the yes and no arguments regarding the question, is advertising good or bad for society? It was obvious to see that both sides of the argument had examples and good points supporting their side. I agree with Dinyar Godrej many lifestyle advertisements are portraying a life which is often unobtainable and a waist of time looking for. However, I also can see the positive power which advertising can have on society if it was used correctly. unfortunately, for the most part corporate giants would rather let their pockets get fatter than inform society on public health or important issues. I also think the scope of the question is extremely wide, with so many different forms of advertising in todays society. Advertising can both be beneficial and detrimental to society depending on the content and the company policy. Advertising is clearly a prominent form of media in the 21st century with a massive amount range and power.
No comments:
Post a Comment